<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What happened to JAX-WS 2.1 &#038; JAX-B 2.1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xlml.com/aehso/2007/03/28/what-happened-to-jax-ws-21-jax-b-21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xlml.com/aehso/2007/03/28/what-happened-to-jax-ws-21-jax-b-21/</link>
	<description>John O'Shea's musings, observations and opinions on anything and everything.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kohsuke</title>
		<link>http://www.xlml.com/aehso/2007/03/28/what-happened-to-jax-ws-21-jax-b-21/#comment-25807</link>
		<dc:creator>Kohsuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xlml.com/aehso/2007/03/28/what-happened-to-jax-ws-21-jax-b-21/#comment-25807</guid>
		<description>In JCP terminology, "JAXB 2.1" corresponds to the maintenance release 1 of JSR-222. So the "maintenance release" that started on Dec 14th 2006 is the JAXB 2.1 release.

JCP website is full of JCP jargons like this, so there's little wonder people get confused about this. I'd like to think JAXB java.net page does a better job of using terms that people understand.

Hope this clears your confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In JCP terminology, &#8220;JAXB 2.1&#8243; corresponds to the maintenance release 1 of JSR-222. So the &#8220;maintenance release&#8221; that started on Dec 14th 2006 is the JAXB 2.1 release.</p>
<p>JCP website is full of JCP jargons like this, so there&#8217;s little wonder people get confused about this. I&#8217;d like to think JAXB java.net page does a better job of using terms that people understand.</p>
<p>Hope this clears your confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aehso</title>
		<link>http://www.xlml.com/aehso/2007/03/28/what-happened-to-jax-ws-21-jax-b-21/#comment-25524</link>
		<dc:creator>aehso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xlml.com/aehso/2007/03/28/what-happened-to-jax-ws-21-jax-b-21/#comment-25524</guid>
		<description>The JCP's JAXB homepage (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=222) still contains no reference to JAXB 2.1.  I appreciate that the JAXB R.I. project page (https://jaxb.dev.java.net/) does but that isn't the 'home' of the spec.

That said, I was indeed referencing JAXB incorrectly in my post, I have updated to correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The JCP&#8217;s JAXB homepage (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=222) still contains no reference to JAXB 2.1.  I appreciate that the JAXB R.I. project page (https://jaxb.dev.java.net/) does but that isn&#8217;t the &#8216;home&#8217; of the spec.</p>
<p>That said, I was indeed referencing JAXB incorrectly in my post, I have updated to correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kohsuke</title>
		<link>http://www.xlml.com/aehso/2007/03/28/what-happened-to-jax-ws-21-jax-b-21/#comment-25425</link>
		<dc:creator>Kohsuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xlml.com/aehso/2007/03/28/what-happened-to-jax-ws-21-jax-b-21/#comment-25425</guid>
		<description>Nothing happened to JAXB 2.1. The spec and the RI are available as usual, and it has never referenced W3C WSDL Binding to begin with.

I think you are mixing up JAXB and JAX-WS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing happened to JAXB 2.1. The spec and the RI are available as usual, and it has never referenced W3C WSDL Binding to begin with.</p>
<p>I think you are mixing up JAXB and JAX-WS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
