What’s 3.2billion, along the long road of many acquisitions?
Is 3.2 billion silly money for a technology that really just enables online demos??? It doesn’t even do cool YouTube web 2.0 demos. What the???
All I know is, every time I have had to do a WebEx in the past I’ve have always had to resort back to IE7 (from Firefox 2). It sucks, but someone payed $3.2billion for a browser dependent presentation platform? HOLY CRAP!
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
What I'm Doing...
- @ubfid Bigger banks are too expensive to bailout/capitalize relative to our GDP. See http://url.ie/xco (Irish GDP inflated by multi-nats!) 1 hr ago
- Weird, Jeff Stelling (brilliant Sky Sports 'Gillette Soccer Saturday' anchor) is to be the new Countdown host. He might be good... 12 hrs ago
- Merging Irish banks until only BOI & AIB exist is terrible idea. Their assets are too expensive to be 'saved' if required(>100% of I ... 16 hrs ago
- I've got a ticket for the Pumas game tomorrow...can't wait! 19 hrs ago
- @donncha OO now has a native OS X build of v3. Latest neooffice is still cut from OO v2 source still I think so it's probably a bit behind. 19 hrs ago
- More updates...
Posting tweet...
Blogroll
LinkRoll
Category Cloud
amazon api app apple atom atompub australia banks beacon berlin blogging blosxom capeclear content copyright data dev drm dublin eclipse economy facebook firefox food football fowa future games google hardware identity internet ireland irish java junk linux mac media microsoft mobile movies music n800 net nooked oauth openid opensocial opml osgi oss patents politics polls process rails railsconf rest rss ruby search soa social software spam sport tech travel trip tv uk us vodafone wayoutthere web2.0 web services why xml yahoo youtube
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- d harris on How many James Bond films are there?
- rud0y on How many James Bond films are there?
- Fergus Burns on Moving On
Archives
Photos
|
