Does Bebo’s Chief Safety Officer know how social network signup works?
The front page of yesterdays Irish Times carried a story about an international expert on online paedophile activity who is suggesting that the Government should provide email addresses to every pupil in Irish schools to help verify their age when signing up to internet communities.
The international expert who suggested this is one Dr Rachel O’Connell, Bebo’s Chief Safety Officer. It is amazing that someone holding such an important position in one of the companies hosting these online communities would propose such a technically deficient policy. Users of social websites can sign up using any email address they own, not just one that a government might allocate.
The technical managers at Bebo would do well to vet these statements in future. They reflect very badly on the percieved competence of the company’s management team as a whole.
2 Comments to Does Bebo’s Chief Safety Officer know how social network signup works?
Leave a comment
What I'm Doing...
- Weird, Jeff Stelling (brilliant Sky Sports 'Gillette Soccer Saturday' anchor) is to be the new Countdown host. He might be good... 1 hr ago
- Merging Irish banks until only BOI & AIB exist is terrible idea. Their assets are too expensive to be 'saved' if required(>100% of I ... 6 hrs ago
- I've got a ticket for the Pumas game tomorrow...can't wait! 8 hrs ago
- @donncha OO now has a native OS X build of v3. Latest neooffice is still cut from OO v2 source still I think so it's probably a bit behind. 9 hrs ago
- @EvertB Wondering if anyone 'in the know' could comment on status of irish mobile operator network capacity? 16 hrs ago
- More updates...
Posting tweet...
Blogroll
LinkRoll
Category Cloud
amazon api app apple atom atompub australia banks beacon berlin blogging blosxom capeclear content copyright data dev drm dublin eclipse economy facebook firefox food football fowa future games google hardware identity internet ireland irish java junk linux mac media microsoft mobile movies music n800 net nooked oauth openid opensocial opml osgi oss patents politics polls process rails railsconf rest rss ruby search soa social software spam sport tech travel trip tv uk us vodafone wayoutthere web2.0 web services why xml yahoo youtube
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- d harris on How many James Bond films are there?
- rud0y on How many James Bond films are there?
- Fergus Burns on Moving On
Archives
Photos
|


The point here is proving that they belong to the school they claim to belong to. If each school has a different email domain we can associate that domain with a school, only pupils of the school would be able to verify the email address which would be a criteria of joining. We do this for university students with great success.
Hi Michael,
Given that the pupil communities in each Irish school seem to have a very active Bebo presence I find it hard to believe that anyone could currently pretend to be attending a school without one of a (many) real pupils from that school noticing.
Adding an email domain check to account registration is therefore really of little or no benefit. It does nothing to address the problem of predators anonymously reading the considerable volumes of personal information that young people routinely disclose about themselves on their pages. It also does nothing to deter predators who build a presence within Bebo by creating accounts that do not specify an association with any educational institution since doing so is entirely optional.
Kids will accidentally or purposely extend their network beyond their school(s) and they will also publish too much information about themselves. I’m not suggesting it is Bebo’s responsibility to actively monitor all minors that use your systems. Ultimately, I believe it is their parents responsibility to monitor their kids usage but that just does not seem to happen, perhaps due to technical illiteracy.
My point is that Bebo’s Chief Safety Officer should not be suggesting that a simple email domain verification check will resolve this problem. Doing so misleads parents into assuming that their kids would then be safe to use social networks unsupervised.