patentsaehso on 22 Apr 2005 12:48 pm
Forgent “own” JPEG - that’s right, the image encoding format used by every man and his dog on the internet for the past 15 years is “owned” by one company who recently (with the aid of a large team of rabid lawyers no doubt) managed to squeeze over $100 million out of some of the largest hardware, software & media companies in the world - Sony included. Most of their customers settled up front for past and future use, some for the paltry sum of $15million. If you want to read the patent in question, go to the US Patent office and search for “4,698,672″.
Standing on the shoulders of giants my ar$e - these guys are just a bunch of chancers with no history of innovation. It would appear they may have bitten off more than they can chew, when they tried milking Microsoft - they have been counter sued and given Microsoft’s recent tangle with Eolas, they won’t give in easly.
Over two years ago, it was reported that the ISO would withdraw ISO/IEC 10918-1:1994 which was based on JPEG encoding/decoding but looking at their website now, the standard is still a published standard - one wonders why?
Here’s a quote from a piece in Imaging Resource over two years ago:
…since this item broke we’ve seen much comment around the web to the effect that other standards should be used - perhaps the most commonly suggested being PNG (Portable Network Graphics). The problem is that it is difficult - if not impossible - to be sure that any standard doesn’t infringe on a patent you’re not even aware of. This was the case with the GIF standard, which CompuServe developed whilst being unaware that UniSys held a patent on the compression method it used. There’s also the possibility of patents being issued whilst a standard is being debated, or potentially even after it has been finalised. This is where the real problem lies.
This whole patent thing will have us all going around in circles chasing our tails, solving the same problems in a multitude of different ways just to avoid what everyone else is doing. That doesn’t bode well for interoperability and hetrogenous networking, the foundations of the IP and the internet as we know it today. Speaking of which, Microsoft have been served with an injunction against shipping Longhorn because a small startup called Alacritech has a patent on the idea of offloading TCP network traffic from the main server CPU. It goes on and on and on…
Still want software patents in the EU?